วันจันทร์ที่ 30 มกราคม พ.ศ. 2555

Chapter:10

The  pros  and  cons  of  information  technology


Information technology has helped the world with the same level. Without his contribution, there is no doubt that we now do not get this "technical world" or. But even if some people raise a number of statements (which may be unfounded) that the information technology (IT) are taking away the privacy of ordinary people and breaking international reputation of the world wide human knowledge.

So let some positive aspects in this article (OPR) and poorEffects (v) Information Technology in places. According to the definition of a Google service, it is said-

"The branch of engineering that get on the use of computers and telecommunications, and store and transmit information." – Definition of Google.

Therefore, the definition in that it provides, it is clear that this is "the branch of technology that helps us communicate with each other, technology transfer individual knowledge, and our store with your computer and other modernmeans Information Technology. "

Information Technology Pro

1. The world has the flexibility

we do or what to think, plan employees, colleagues and friends are our shared with. Internet technology, this system has a high degree. The idea of ​​the telephone (Alexander Graham Bell) was changed and made like mobile phones, to increase the flexibility in communication and talk to our dear comrades, wheneverDemand!

2. The sense of responsibility has increased

Let 'Barack Obama President of USA, "as the figure. The use of networking sites (Twitter and Facebook), blogs, social bookmarking, the LEADER approach in the world, if necessary, we can send messages and updates that are ( or will be made by us) will be 'within a very short period of time.

3. Just to think, and developments in the transport sector

Of thought and research, weResources need to find out what people thought of our past, which the quotations that have left us (information theory + +). We can use it with a single click in the search engines (especially Google ™, Yahoo) to find. By a clear cut idea, we have the opportunity to help the world with new ideas and technological inventions and to share what we learned during our lives.

And over the centuries has contributed to a widening of the transport strategy that helps us attend to one place to anotherof (roads, highways, air, water and sky!)

4. This allows you to save thousands of lives every day

Then, from the point of entry I hope you understand me relate to the development of the medical field. Every day people relief with the perfect use of medicine, hospital technology, by adding (X-rays, laser treatments) and more in the queue. With the combination of World Health Organization, several life-threatening diseases to overcome and be expelled from the newly establishedCountries rapidly and the plans and ideas.

5. Increase the sense of human rights

Technology can remember those of our human rights, basic needs and updates made ​​available to or around the world where it is necessary to help alleviate. During earthquakes, floods, horrible, that during the cooperation is necessary on the World Wide Web Help us to collect the donation of a set.

They can not understand, it's about good and bad sides of the Information and Technology ManagementWithin a page and how, as he mixes with all aspects and angles of our lives. Rather, we have seen in side effects bad side (cons) that led in the sectors of human society.

Information Technology Cons

He pulled the privacy of individuals

As the IT sector the hearts of people around the world have wined. People are here to share and store any kind of information, the date of the individuals in their private hard drives and onlineDatabases. But because of some computer criminals, is not as safe, both online and offline. If someone has a little "sloppy, he / she has to pay high. (E 'heavy).

The online community is not safe for the family more

Children under the age can often share cell numbers, e-mail contact, which can be manipulated by people and pass it to the criminals who harm a blueprint of the company. And people lose their privacy and credit card payments from otherProcessing options. Again, there are several Web sites created perverse that a child can be worn under the age of eighteen in a different place – that the nation is to bring Harms.

E 'intention to harm a human Natural Power

People should be the best of all creations (in Islam). We can imagine, to collect the human principles (ethical knowledge) and then working relationships with friends and family. But because of the harmful aspects of the (IT) People are always fullbased technology. And it can bring great harm to society by taking away the thoughts and ideas of natural organic.

You can bring effective administration without World Destruction

This is something more that I write, having regard to the various science-fiction. Great scholars have, even if the problem with wisdom. Up to now (people) we are holding a prominent place in the world and the management of information technology. But come one day, when theThe technology is for us to manage all aspects. It is possible that we will probably convert the slaves of technology.

So from this I am not trying to say that the technology to bring harm here, just because I have a technological man over 24 hours of navigation computer and talk on the phone itself. But as part of human society, we must take a look at both sides.

Reference:  http://technology-personal-tech.chailit.com/the-pros-and-cons-of-information-technology.html

วันจันทร์ที่ 23 มกราคม พ.ศ. 2555

chapter : 9 Evaluation

Goood Website :

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bias information :



Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Obama

  1. In a most deceitful, fascist political tactic Wikipedia's biography on Barack Obama discusses in detail his early childhood from when his parents met in 1960 to 1994 when Obama first served on the board of directors of the Woods Fund of Chicago. Then the article skips 1995 when Obama accepted the nomination and ran as a candidate of a Marxist political party called the New Party,[1] and it jumps ahead to after "Obama was elected to the Illinois Senate in 1996."[2] The stink of intellectual corruption in Wikipedia reeks of deceit, censoring an entire year of Barack Obama's life as a candidate before he got elected.[3]
  2. Barack Obama cannot give a coherent speech without reading from a teleprompter,[4] and even had two of them set up in an elementary school just to talk to reporters there. But Wikipedia's lengthy entry about Obama does not mention the teleprompter, not even once.
  3. Wikipedia lists Factcheck.org as a "non-partisan" "'consumer advocate' for voters that aims to reduce the level of deception and confusion in U.S. politics."[5] However, two attempted edits were deleted pointing out factcheck.org falsely claims that Barry Soetoro (aka Barack Obama) has produced his birth certificate: "FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate."[6] This claim contradicts the fact that the document they refer to is a copy of a Certificate Of Live Birth, produced in 2007, as opposed to a Birth Certificate. While later in the page, it states that detractors claim it is a "'certification of birth', not a 'certificate of birth'" (actually "Certificate Of Live Birth" and "Birth Certificate" respectively). Factcheck.org clouds the verbage by getting the actual terms wrong and presenting the two items as synonymous.[7]
  4. Barack Obama lost by a 2-1 margin in a congressional primary in 2000, but Wikipedia reduces that fact to merely one hard-to-find sentence amid its exaggerated praise.[8]
  5. Wikipedia's entry on Barack Obama claims that he "was selected as an editor of the law review based on his grades and a writing competition,"[9] when in fact the Harvard Law Review has long used racial quotas for admission.[10]
  6. Wikipedia added a "Controversies" sections to their article for the "Presidency of George W. Bush"[11] but not to their article on the "Presidency of Barack Obama"[12] It has since been removed.[13]
  7. In addition to the previous example, there was a massive Wikipedia article for "Criticism of George W. Bush,"[14] but the article for "Criticism of Barack Obama" had been deleted at least FOUR TIMES since October 2008 with excuses like "Article that has no meaningful, substantive content" and "Attack page or negative unsourced BLP."[15] Wikipedia has since redirected "Criticism of George W. Bush" and added "Public image of" articles for both presidents, however President Bush's article is heavily negative[16] while President Obama's is filled with glowing, pandering fluff with very few meaningful criticisms.[17]
  8. The article about the legitimate questions surrounding President Obama's birth certificate is entitled "Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories,"[18] however one is hard-pressed to find such bold use of the phrase "conspiracy theory" in articles about Dominionism[19], the 9/11 Truth movement[20], and many other conspiracy theories that the left favors. The article also describes advocates of the questions as "fringe" several times despite including the likes of Michelle Malkin, Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh, but the same word is only used once in the 9/11 Truth movement article (and it uses it in a quote stating that the movement isn't fringe) and not at all in the Dominionism article.
  9. Wikipedia made no mention of the fact that President Obama's Attorney General Eric Holder called the United States a "nation of cowards"[21][22][23] when it comes to the discussion of race until about two weeks after Holder insulted America. [24] In typical Wikipedia fashion, it was made to sound as if only conservatives such as Rush Limbaugh objected to the attorney general's crass insult and obvious contempt for the citizens of the United States of America. As of 3/8/09, there is no mention on Wikipedia of Obama's rebuke of Holder's "cowards" insult or of the fact that Holder wants an assault weapons ban. [25]
  10. Wikipedia feels that the Barack Obama article should omit any mention of William Ayers and the Weather Underground. Wikipedia's mobocracy has decided that you, the public, have no need to learn about Obama's past relationships that made national headlines. No mention of Obama's ties to ACORN either. [26]
  11. Wikipedia covers for Obama and his Libyan war. 287,304 byte article mentions Obama's name once, the very last sentence. [2] Despite the UN, NATO, France and now Sudan, [3] Wikipedia calls it a civil war.
  12. Wikipedia does not make any mention of the man who influenced Obama, John Maynard Keynes' known fraud and pedophilia